th images menu user export search eye clock list list2 arrow-left untitled twitter facebook googleplus instagram cross photos entrep-logo-svg

This Was How Bad the Economy Got After Aquino Was Killed on Aug. 21, 1983

The cold-blooded murder turned the regime’s economic ills into a full-blown crisis
By Pauline Macaraeg |




In most retellings of the assassination of Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr. on August 21, 1983, which is being commemorated today, the cold-blooded killing is often credited for sparking widespread outrage among ordinary citizens previously cowed by over a decade of martial rule. A little over two years later, that outrage developed into a massive political movement that toppled Ferdinand Marcos’ dictatorship on February 26, 1986.



But the impact of the Aquino assassination wasn’t just confined to the political sphere. The killing of the popular opposition leader also had important economic consequences that were felt for years if not decades afterwards. The event exacerbated the regime’s outstanding economic ills and turned them into a full-blown economic crisis.


As the first graph shows, the economic impact of the killing became pronounced only months afterwards when the peso began a steep fall, and inflation and Treasury bill rates (as indicator for the cost of borrowing) began to shoot upwards. Before August 1983, all three indicators were relatively stable. Afterwards, it all became volatile.


As the professors at the University of Philippines School of Economics (UPSE) put it in their 1984 report titled An Analysis of the Philippine Economic Crisis: “There is no doubt that, viewed as a historical event, the Philippines’ economic crisis was precipitated by the assassination of former Senator Benigno S. Aquino on August 21, 1983.”



To be sure, the report acknowledged that the country’s economic situation was already turning bad before the incident. Still, the death of Aquino created a major shock, which provoked the crisis, they said.


“With Aquino’s assassination, a crisis of confidence in the present government seized the foreign banks,” the UPSE professors said. According to the report, foreign banks refused to renew the short-term loans of the government, which it had been heavily relying on “for financing its deficit on trade and payments, in a strategy of ‘riding out’ the recession without making drastic changes in its income target growth.”


In October 1983, two months after Aquino’s death, the government declared a 90-day moratorium on external debt payments for the first time, which stopped all official dollar trading. The moratorium was extended four consecutive times.


The government also cut the budget for 1984 and imposed restrictions on foreign exchange. “The October devaluation triggered inflationary expectations, which further raised prices,” the UPSE professors said. According to data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), inflation spiked from 10 percent to 63 percent in just a year.



The restrictions on foreign exchange trading encouraged the rapid growth of the black market for dollars, which were bought and sold for Php27/$1 or more than double the official rate of Php14/$1, according to an essay in the book Dictatorship and Revolution: Roots of People’s Power.


The long-term consequences of the political and economic crisis triggered by the events in 1983 are laid bare in the second graph, which shows that the economic contraction in the mid-1980s were the worst the Philippines has gone through since after the Second World War. It caused a sharp fall in per capita GDP, an indicator of the average income per person, from which Filipinos recovered only in the early 2000s.






Pauline Macaraeg is Entrepreneur PH's data journalist. Follow her on Twitter @paulinemacaraeg

Latest Articles