Workers often cite union busting as their reason for striking. According to Azucena, union busting exists when union officers are being dismissed; those officers were duly elected in accordance with the union’s constitution and by-laws; and the existence of the union is threatened. In this case, no cooling-off period is required of the union before it strikes, but it must still file a notice of strike, take a strike vote, and submit the strike vote report.
THE RIGHT TO LOCK OUT WORKERS
If labor has the right to strike, management may declare a lockout—“the temporary refusal… to furnish work as a result of an industrial or labor dispute”—provided it is lawful. Strikes and lockouts essentially are the same in that they both result in work stoppage, and arise from a labor dispute. As a result, the rules on strikes apply equally to lockouts: management may declare a lockout in case of a collective bargaining deadlock or unfair labor practices by the union.
However, a lockout by management is valid only if:
- it has filed a notice to declare it with the Department of Labor
- at least 30 days have elapsed since its filing of the notice before it declares the lockout
- the collective bargaining talks with the union have reached an impasse
- the lockout is not discriminatory.
As with worker strikes, various Supreme Court decisions have upheld the employer’s right to lock out employees if it is necessary to preserve company property or the management’s bargaining position. Strikes and lockouts are powerful weapons if used properly and damaging if abused. It is enough for labor and management to realize that they have options under the law to ensure self-preservation if their rights and security are threatened.